Noma Begins Its Next Act Without René Redzepi at the Helm

Noma has reopened in Copenhagen, but this is not another of the restaurant’s meticulously choreographed returns from a residency abroad. It is an experiment in succession, accountability and the endurance of an idea once inseparable from the chef who created it.

The restaurant resumed service on 5 August 2026 with René Redzepi no longer directing its daily operations. Executive head chef Pablo Soto, head of research and development Mette Brink Søberg and chief executive Annika de Las Heras now hold the operational reins. All three have been formed within Noma rather than recruited to impose an identity from outside.

That continuity is both the new chapter’s strength and its central complication. Noma must preserve the restless curiosity that made it one of the defining restaurants of the century while demonstrating that its future will not simply reproduce the culture, hierarchy and mythology of its past.

An institution larger than a restaurant

Since opening in 2003, Noma has occupied a rare place in global gastronomy. Its influence extended far beyond the dishes served in Copenhagen, reshaping conversations around seasonality, fermentation, foraging, locality and the very definition of a luxury ingredient.

The restaurant was named the world’s best five times, in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014 and 2021. It helped turn Copenhagen into an international dining destination and encouraged a generation of chefs to look more closely at their immediate landscapes rather than treating established French markers of opulence as the only route to culinary distinction.

Redzepi was the face, voice and creative force most closely associated with that transformation. Noma’s fame became bound to his personality: exacting, ambitious and seemingly compelled to dismantle the restaurant whenever routine threatened to settle in. There were closures, relocations and residencies in destinations including Tokyo, Sydney, Tulum, Kyoto and Los Angeles. Reinvention became part of the brand’s architecture.

The present transition is different. It is not a carefully planned change of season or scenery, but a response to a profound leadership crisis. Former employees made allegations of physical, verbal and psychological abuse, largely relating to the period between 2009 and 2017. Redzepi said that he did not recognise every detail of the accounts, while acknowledging that aspects of his past behaviour had harmed people. He apologised and stepped away from leading the restaurant in March 2026.

A leadership model built from within

Rather than appointing a single successor as Noma’s next auteur, the restaurant has divided responsibility among three longstanding members of its organisation.

Soto, who joined Noma in 2017 and has since held senior kitchen roles, is responsible for execution as executive head chef. His promotion reflects an attempt to retain the restaurant’s accumulated knowledge without casting him as a replacement Redzepi. This is an important distinction. The new structure appears designed to distribute authority rather than simply transfer the old concentration of power to another individual.

Brink Søberg leads research and development, overseeing the exploratory work from which the restaurant’s dishes and techniques emerge. De Las Heras, who has been part of the organisation since 2012, leads its business and organisational direction as chief executive.

Redzepi remains Noma’s owner and creative director, with a continuing influence on longer-term ideas and projects. He has not disappeared from the organisation, nor has the restaurant presented the transition as a complete severance. Operational control, however, now sits with the new leadership team. The credibility of that distinction will be judged through practice rather than titles alone.

From three seasons to twelve

The most visible expression of Noma’s new era is the decision to abandon its familiar three-menu calendar in favour of what it calls twelve seasons. Instead of allowing seafood, vegetables, and game and forest to define large sections of the year, the restaurant intends to develop a more fluid menu that changes from month to month.

August begins with the brightness of late summer: berries, flowers, vegetables and sweet seafood. By October, the emphasis is expected to deepen towards wild mushrooms, stone fruits, game and red shellfish. Individual dishes may vanish quickly, while others will be adjusted gradually as ingredients and conditions change.

It is an enticing proposition for returning guests, who are being invited to encounter the creative process while it is still moving. It is also an immense operational challenge. Noma’s previous seasonal model already demanded intensive research, preservation and development. Compressing that cycle into monthly expressions requires an unusually responsive relationship between the test kitchen, producers, foragers and service team.

At its best, the format could make Noma feel less like a finished monument and more like a living workshop. The risk is that constant novelty becomes an obligation rather than a source of discovery. The new team will need to distinguish genuine seasonal responsiveness from change pursued for its own sake.

The luxury of a better kitchen culture

For contemporary fine dining, luxury can no longer be measured exclusively by scarcity, technical difficulty or the length of a reservation waiting list. The conditions under which an experience is produced have become inseparable from its value.

Noma’s new leadership has placed greater emphasis on staff wellbeing and on enabling employees to maintain lives beyond the restaurant. Soto has spoken about the importance of colleagues being able to have families, pets, interests and futures alongside demanding culinary careers. An internal review has taken place, and the restaurant says systems have been introduced to support staff development and welfare.

Those commitments arrive under scrutiny. They will need to be visible in schedules, management behaviour, avenues for raising concerns and the treatment of junior employees—not merely in the language of renewal.

This matters beyond Noma. The restaurant’s influence has always travelled. Its ingredients, techniques and visual grammar were imitated internationally; its approach to leadership will now be watched with similar attention. If one of fine dining’s most celebrated institutions can reconcile creative intensity with dignity at work, that may prove more consequential than another influential plate.

Returning without Michelin stars

Noma’s reopened dining room is not included in the 2026 Michelin Guide Nordic Countries. This should not be confused with the restaurant being stripped of its former three-star distinction. Its Copenhagen operation had not been open for a sufficient period to be assessed for the edition, and the restaurant did not participate.

The absence nevertheless gives this chapter an unusual clarity. Noma begins again without the immediate shield of its former Michelin status, even while retaining the reputation and demand built across more than two decades.

The menu is priced at 4,500 Danish kroner per guest. A wine pairing adds 2,000 kroner, while the juice pairing is 1,500 kroner. The restaurant operates from Wednesday to Saturday, and its first booking period runs through the end of October.

Demand has remained formidable. Yet the meaningful measure of this reopening will not be whether tables can be filled. Curiosity alone can sustain an initial season. The deeper question is whether diners, employees and the wider culinary world come to believe in the institution’s evolution.

Can Noma exist beyond its founder?

Restaurants of Noma’s stature often struggle with succession because their mythology is built around singular authorship. The stronger the founder’s image, the more difficult it becomes for the organisation to reveal the collective labour beneath it.

Noma’s answer is not to erase Redzepi, but to reposition him while making the team more legible. That approach is inherently unresolved. His creative presence may offer continuity, but it also complicates the claim that a fundamentally different culture is emerging.

For Soto, Brink Søberg and de Las Heras, the task is therefore greater than maintaining standards. They must decide what belongs to Noma itself and what belonged to Redzepi’s manner of leading it. They must preserve intellectual courage without preserving fear; rigour without humiliation; ambition without the assumption that suffering is its necessary price.

This is the restaurant’s true experiment. The monthly menus may alter how Noma cooks, but the leadership transition will determine what Noma becomes.

Noma has survived reinvention before because it understood that its greatest luxury was never a particular ingredient or technique. It was the freedom to question its own form. In 2026, that instinct is being applied not only to the menu, but to power, authorship and institutional identity.

Whether this becomes a genuine transformation or merely a change in configuration will take time to establish. For now, Noma is once again cooking in Copenhagen—still recognisable, still coveted, but facing the most searching creative brief of its existence: how to carry forward a legacy without remaining captive to the man who defined it.

Imagery disclaimer

Imagery rights remain with their respective owners, photographers and licensors. Simply Luxury will amend crediting or remove material promptly upon request.